Search for: "S. G.2"
Results 1 - 20
of 16,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2008, 7:41 am
This posting covers Links on the LawPundit Main Page : (2) (g) The Law Blogroll - G:The Georgetown Law Faculty Blog inter alia contains postings from John Mikhail, who specializes in the confluence of moral theory and law. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am
2. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
Was G 2/21 even about plausibility? [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:30 pm
T 681/21 main request – the deadly side of G 2/21? [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:47 am
It is now some weeks since we received the EBA's decision in G 2/21 on the standard of evidence required for inventive step (often referred to as the "plausibility" referral). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
G 2/21 has not changed this requirement. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:06 pm
G 2/21 case catch-up: The evidence standard for inventive step (it's not about plausibility)At issue in the case referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) in G 2/21 were product claims to a new combination of known insecticides (EP 2484209). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:41 am
In G 2/21, the EBA supports and confirms this view. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:54 am
We refer to our previous blog post about referral G 2/19 (and this related post). [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 1:45 am
2. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:17 am
EP 2 753 168) for the sole reason that the claimed subject-matter falls within the exception to patentability according to Article 53(b) and Rule 28(2) EPC (here: plants exclusively obtained by means of an essentially biological process).At the oral proceedings, which took place on 5 December 2018, Technical Board of Appeal 3304, in an enlarged composition consisting of three technically and two legally qualified members, held that Rule… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:19 pm
Because G was a joint tenant immediately before G’s death, S’s fractional interest, for purposes of Section 2-207, is determined immediately before G’s death, disregarding the fact that G predeceased S. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:21 pm
The commuted value of S’s income interest as of G’s death is included in the augmented estate under Section 2-207. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
To this Kat, the EBA's use of the phrase "derivable" implies that an explicit mention of the technical effect is not required (see G 2/21 r.65). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:38 pm
SECTION 2-205. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
MISSED SIX-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONSAfter G&Y Maintenance started its case against McSam Hotel Group and others, alleging “breach of contract, account stated, breach of a fiduciary duty, fraud, and unjust enrichment,” the New York County Supreme Court ended up granting the defendants’ dismissal request.And on appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that since G&Y’s claims arose back in 2013, and the action hadn’t been… [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:07 am
§ 922(g) and § 924(a)(2), the Government must prove both that the defendant knew he possessed a firearm and that he knew he belonged to the relevant category of persons barred from possessing a firearm. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 1:48 am
Further readingPlausibility demystified - a review of EPO case law before G 2/21 (Feb 2023)G 2/21: Is the technical effect embodied by the invention as originally disclosed? [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
“Californians disapprove of Supreme Court’s work by a 2-1 ratio”: David G. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
G&G’s argument states that they were granted the exclusive rights to the commercial distribution of the Saul “Canelo” Alvarez v. [read post]
